/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) cognitive processes (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: cognitive processes
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines192 - : The approach was illustrated with descriptive results of the RedACTe Project, particularly, with generalizations about the LGP associated with the terminal genre category [research announcement] as proposed in Hlavacka (2004). There are two main subtypes of cognitive processes involved in the realization of this genre category: the examine subtype and the discuss subtype (cf . §3.2). The choice of one or the other depends on the research announcement orientation that the researcher-writer wishes to adopt in writing this RAA text location. These two subtypes, furthermore, interact in interesting ways with decisions related to whether to make explicit or not the orientation adopted. Thus, if an explicit research-oriented announcement is chosen, the writer is algorithmically assisted to choose either hiding himself behind the research (in which case the research will end up as the Agent of a cognitive process of the examine subtype), or competing with the research in the participant role
2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines406 - : “a metacognitive process… essential for competent reading, which directs the reader’s cognitive processes as he/she strives to make sense of incoming textual information” (Wagoner, 1983: 328 ).
Evaluando al candidato cognitive processes:
2) announcement: 3
3) subtype: 3
cognitive processes
Lengua: eng
Frec: 46
Docs: 35
Nombre propio: / 46 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.581 = ( + (1+2.8073549220576) / (1+5.55458885167764)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| cognitive processes |
: Altmann, G. (1988). Ambiguity, parsing strategies, and computational models. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(2), 73-97. : Athanasopoulos, P. (2007). Interaction between grammatical categories and cognition in bilinguals: The role of proficiency, cultural immersion, and language of instruction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 689- 699. : Burani, C. & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227. : Caplan, D., Hildebrandt, N. & Waters, G. S. (1994). Interaction of verb selectional restrictions, noun animacy and syntactic form in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(4), 549-585. : Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27, 44-47. : Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. En L. Gregg & E. Teinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. : Flower, L. y J. Hayes (1980b) The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. En L. Gregg y E. Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hove, Sussex and Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 31-50 : Gaskell, M. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 583-607. : Guasti, M.T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini,A. & Meroni. L. (2005).Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 667-696. : Gómez, D. M., Bion, R. A. H. & Mehler, J. (2011). The word segmentation process as revealed by click detection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 212-223. : Hagoort, P., Brown, C. & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483. : Hayes, J. & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing process. En L.W. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Just, M. & Carpenter, P. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480. : Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1(1), 61-85. : Koornneef, A.W. & Sanders, T. (2012). Establishing coherence relations in discourse: The influence on implicit causality and connectives on pronoun resolution. Language and cognitive processes, 28, 1169-1206. : Leonard, T. & Cummins, F. (2010). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1295-1309. : Linderholm, T. , Virtue, S., van den Broek, P. & Tzeng, Y. (2004). Fluctuations in the availability of information during reading: Capturing cognitive processes using the landscape model. Discourse Processes, 37(2), 165-186. : MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157-201. : McRae, K., Ferretti, T. R. & Amyote, L. (1997). Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(2-3), 137-176. : Ni, W., Crain, S. & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics, and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283-334. : Poulin-Dubois, D. & Graham, S. (2007). Cognitive processes in early word learning. En E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Development (pp. 191-211). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. : Rayner, K. & Kiegl, R. (2012). Eye movements and cognitive processes. En H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 413-427). Washington, DC: APA. : Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second Language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 117-131 [en línea]. Disponible en: [373]http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/2.2.117 : Spinelli, E., Segui, J. & Radeau, M. (2001). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(4), 367-392. : Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391. : Séguinot, C. (1997). Accounting for variability in translation. In J. H. Danks, G. M. Shreve, S. B. Fountain & M. K. McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting (pp. 104-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. : Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294. : Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. & Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3-4), 211-234. : Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B. J. & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neuro-cognitive account. Language and cognitive processes, 26(9), 1368-1401. : Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87. : Winn, W. (1994). Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. En W. Schontz & R. W. Kulhay (Eds.), Comprehension of graphics (pp. 3-28). North-Holland, Elsevier. |